|
Post by gorepolice on Sept 18, 2011 23:23:06 GMT -5
I'll take your Leprechaun and raise you a Troll 2.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Hates Everything on Oct 12, 2011 13:54:33 GMT -5
i bought scream4 lol oh man this movie is just the best thing i have ever seen..... im so upset
|
|
|
Post by gorepolice on Oct 12, 2011 23:55:40 GMT -5
I warned you!
|
|
|
Post by endo on Oct 13, 2011 0:03:29 GMT -5
Lol, I was just talking about this movie today at work. A co-worker was like it's on DVD and I was...already? Didn't it just come out?? Time flies or the movie sucks. In this case I guess the latter.
|
|
|
Post by gorepolice on Oct 13, 2011 0:04:12 GMT -5
It sucked. BAD.
|
|
|
Post by endo on Oct 13, 2011 0:33:53 GMT -5
That's what I was thinking. I really liked the first one, and it went downhill from there.
|
|
|
Post by NDX on Oct 13, 2011 1:03:58 GMT -5
No matter what, just because I have to, I WILL watch this. Maybe even own it.
|
|
|
Post by endo on Oct 13, 2011 1:08:13 GMT -5
Oh, it's already in my queue. Bad is good, unless it's really bad....but sometimes then, it's really good, lol. Have to see it for myself. I'm sure it sucks as Gore said, but now I have to gauge the epicness of the suck for myself. I hope I make it through.
|
|
|
Post by gorepolice on Oct 13, 2011 1:27:55 GMT -5
I'm just gonna say this...it WILL be in my list of worst movies of the year.
|
|
|
Post by endo on Oct 13, 2011 1:30:23 GMT -5
Oh man. That bad? I may have to re-evaluate.
|
|
|
Post by gorepolice on Oct 13, 2011 1:32:10 GMT -5
It's not the absolute worst thing I've seen this year, but it'll be top (or would that be bottom?) 5 for sure.
|
|
|
Post by endo on Oct 13, 2011 1:47:32 GMT -5
What's $7.99 divided by....20? I'll watch it for that. I'll probably be sorry, but for the price, if I hate it, I haven't lost much. At least I can post about it knowing I've seen it.
|
|
|
Post by NDX on Oct 13, 2011 1:47:49 GMT -5
I can't wait to see that full list.
|
|
|
Post by queenfreaky2 on Nov 17, 2011 8:19:19 GMT -5
I finally got around to this last night. It was nt great and I knew it would nt be (after all its a sequel of a sequeal of a sequel), but what annoyed me was that it really did have potential. If they had paid a bit more attention to the storyline, it could have worked out ok, but some of it was kinda confusing and I thought it was really rushed through. Lets see how many teenagers we can stab in the head in 90 mins, which is nt automatically a bad thing, but is nt the only thing a horror film should be about. also the acting was terrible. seeing as all the main characters were in it, (sidney, gail, dewie), all portrayed by well established and talented actors, it should have made the film much more entertaining. You expect crap acting from newbies but from people like Neve Campbell, whom should be able to play this role in her sleep, she kinda stumbled her way through it, looking pretty bored. Maybe she did act it in her sleep??
I will say one thing in its defence..... I did nt guess "who did it" which Im normally pretty good at. So thats a bonus point.
|
|
|
Post by Tony Hates Everything on Dec 1, 2011 16:01:34 GMT -5
I guessed it half way thru but did second guess myself several times due to clues not adding up even in the end they don't seem likely but I'm sure I mentioned rewatching it because I own the damn thing and if you except it for what it is the film isn't that bad... A town that lives a horror movie and everyone knows it.. their killer follows rules... It has to be a bit goofy for that reason
|
|